The "cold fusion" phenomenon may be attributed to experimental errors mistakenly indicating an excess production of energy. Those theories explaining cold fusion require revisions in existing theories, and scientific skepticism Line requires that unless the experimental evidence justifies belief in these miracles,one must conclude that experimental errors are being misinterpreted as positive proof of cold fusion’s possibility. One would expect half of all careful energy-balance measurements in cold fusion experiments to indicate excess energy, and about half to show an energy deficit, because experimental error spreads the results around the expected outcome. The recent preponderance of results showing excess energy might indicate something new, but if one is deliberately searching for excess energy, then one may be able to "optimize" a complicated system to yield large amounts of apparent excess energy by fooling the measurement apparatus somehow. Whether a given excess-heat result represents a physical "miracle" or an experimental error is very difficult to determine if the amount of excess heat is small or if the fraction of excess power to total input power is simply too low.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would MOST likely agree with which of the following statements concerning the scientific method（）